“I am not going to answer your trick questions, Mr. Wisenberg.”


White-Collar Crime: Between Indictment and Trial


A. Whether And When To Plead Guilty

There can be certain advantages to pleading guilty before, rather than after, indictment. In many federal districts you will never get as good of a plea offer from the government as the offer you get pre-indictment. Also, by pleading guilty at the earliest possible time, that is, at the pre-indictment stage, you may increase your chances of obtaining a 5K1.1 downward departure recommendation from the government under the Guidelines.

On the other hand, if you have the resources to mount a defense, you will often find the most weaknesses in the government’s case after indictment. This is because you will learn more about the government’s case once you start filing motions and obtaining discovery. The government is under no obligation to provide you with discovery materials until after you have been indicted. More importantly, the government is under no obligation to provide you with exculpatory information under the Brady doctrine until the post-indictment phase. The weaker the government’s case is, the more likely you are to prevail at trial or to force the government to offer a better deal. In addition, with respect to the issue of downward departures, now that the Guidelines are advisory, the trial judge has the ability to hand down a sentence significantly lower than the recommended Guidelines range. In effect, the judge can give you his or her own downward departure even without a government recommendation. So, if you decide to wait until after indictment and the obtaining of discovery to enter a plea agreement you can still cooperate with the government and have a shot at a downward departure from either the prosecution or the judge.

B. The Risk Of Going To Trial

Even in our era of advisory Guidelines, there is a tremendous risk for the federal white-collar defendant in going to trial. As noted earlier, most federal judges can be expected to follow the recommended Guidelines range most of the time. Federal prosecutors, through the selective handing out of 5K1.1 downward departures and the manipulation of Guidelines “amount of loss” figures, can dramatically reduce the potential sentence of a cooperating witness. A white-collar crime defendant who opts for trial and loses can easily wind up with a real-time sentence of 10 to 20 years more than that of a cooperating defendant in the same case.


NEXT PART – Going To Federal Trial

Share This!

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pocket
Share on email
Share on print


Solomon L. Wisenberg has extensive lead counsel experience in complex white collar criminal investigations and jury trials. His nationwide practice is primarily devoted to representing individuals and businesses exposed to federal criminal and regulatory inquiries or charged with federal crimes. READ FULL BIOGRAPHY

Related Posts

White-Collar Crime: The Crash Course

A Primer for Individuals Exposed to Federal Fraud Charges By Solomon L. Wisenberg Solomon L. Wisenberg is a partner and co-chair of the white collar criminal defense practice group of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP. Introduction: Witness-Subject-Target At the heart of most white-collar crime investigations is an Assistant United States Attorney with a bevy of federal agents

Read This

White-Collar Crime: Client and Attorney Expectations

Part 2. What Do The Client And The Attorney Have A Right To Expect From Each Other? A. What Your Federal White-Collar Attorney Must Know To competently handle a federal white-collar crime case, your attorney must, at a minimum, be thoroughly grounded in the law of federal criminal procedure as well as the substantive criminal

Read This



Have A Question?